top of page
Trees

Environmental Impact

This page looks at the environmental impact of the chosen vertical farms and compares them to that of traditional farming.

Traditional agricultural practices contribute to about 20% of global annual emission of CO2 [1]. The carbon footprint refers to how much greenhouse gas is emitted from an activity of an enterprise. The carbon footprint for a farm is the ratio of total GHG emissions to total outputs of the farm enterprise. Carbon emission may be calculated from direct or indirect emissions [2]. Direct emissions are as a result of activities directly linked with the farm like irrigation, harvesting, tillage which all require the use of diesel machinery responsible for emission of CO2 into the atmosphere. The indirect sources include purchased electricity from the grid and transportation of crop produce to customer location. Other greenhouse gases are Nitrous oxide and methane.

In terms of carbon footprint, comparisons were made between the traditional and vertical farms (Liberty Farms in Dundee and CropBox in America) to verify the gap in the emission of CO2 between the two types of farming techniques and to justify the advantage of vertical farming. To make this comparison, the emissions from both the direct and indirect source are quantified, tabulated and multiplied by the appropriate carbon factor (emission coefficient provided by the UK Government) [3]

1table better.png

Table 1: Carbon emissions for Traditional Farming

 

On the other hand, when calculating the carbon footprint for the vertical farms, although there were no emissions from direct sources as in traditional farming like irrigation, harvesting and tilling. Emission as a result of purchased electricity from the grid (non-renewable) was high about 36000kWh for Liberty Farms in Dundee and 56000kWh for Cropbox in North America. This is due to the high lighting, heating and cooling demand associated with vertical farming.

2table.png

Table 2: Carbon emissions for Vertical Farm (CropBox)

 

 

The traditional farm has two cycles of produce per annum for a once acre farmland, while the vertical farm with an area of 75Sqm can produce 8 cycles of lettuce in one year. The amount of produce per kg of produce is used for calculating the amount of carbon emission per kg of produce (KgCO2e / Kg).

The results showed that the carbon footprint for the traditional farm is by far higher than for the vertical farms.

3graph.png

Figure 1: Comparison between carbon emission of traditional and vertical farming per kg of produce (lettuce)

 

Using the esp-r model, the installation of PV on the roof of the container was simulated to further reduce the electricity purchased. Results showed that the purchased electricity can be reduced by 10-20% using renewables (Solar PV). Consequently, this reduces the carbon footprint for vertical farming.

4graph.png

Figure 2: Solar PV power generation compared with purchased electricity (Liberty Farm)

5graph.png

Figure 3: Solar PV power generation compared with purchased electricity (Cropbox Farm)

 

 

Electricity demand can further be reduced by installing more solar panels, purchasing from the grid (renewable sources) or applying load shifting by buying electricity at lower tariffs during off peak periods.

​

If you'd like to look at our environmental results, feel free to download our carbon footprint excel here

​

References

 

[1] Carbon emission from farm operations

R. Lal, 2004.

Carbon emission from farm operations - ScienceDirect

 

[2] A model calculation of the carbon footprint of agricultural products: The case of Slovenia

F. Al-Mansour a, V. Jejcic b, 2016

A model calculation of the carbon footprint of agricultural products: The case of Slovenia - ScienceDirect

 

[3] Uk Government GHG Conversion Factors for Company reporting

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/government-conversion-factors-for-company-reporting

bottom of page